Friday, 11 April 2014
Auld Reekie Readers
Far from stinking, Auld Reekie Readers is a group of readers and writers who meet up to share their work and listen to authors read.
As such I'll be talking about Edwin Morgan, sci-fi poetry, writing and editing, on Monday 14th April.
It's at the City Cafe in Edinburgh (EH1 1QR) and starts at 18:30.
Be there or be...somewhere else!
https://www.facebook.com/events/284725768357737/
Russell Jones
Monday, 31 March 2014
Writing...and monkeys
Writing...and monkeys
This is a post about writing, and that
mystical art of “process”. Essentially it's a bunch of blog posts
from various writers – known and unknown – about why they do what
they do, and how it is they go about doing it. It's not a book of
hints on “how to be a writer” or a set of tricks to get you
motivated, so far as I can tell, but a glimpse inside the private
lives of the freaks and geeks amongst us, those people who sit on
their lonesome and scribble down what the voices in their heads tell
them to say...
I received this calling to write a post
on “the writing process” from Pippa Goldschmidt, and as the
tradition dictates I shall now tell you a little about her:
Pippa is a professional astronomer,
which to me makes her incredibly cool before she's even opened her
mouth or put pen to paper. She is also the author of The Falling Sky, a novel which has received
great acclaim and which I ignorantly still need to read. But I do
know this: it's about a female astronomer whose discovery could
unravel current understandings of The Big Bang. She is also a fine
poet and I included her work in Where Rockets Burn Through:Contemporary Science Fiction Poems from the UK.
If you've an interest in science and fiction then she's a definite
go-to contemporary writer. Go, go check out her work and ramblings,
go now! You can check out her site here, which includes her own post about the way she goes about getting the good words down and chucking
the bad ones out.
And so
the nebula has been passed on to me. The task is to answer four
questions, so here we go...
Question
1: What am I working on?
Back
in January I was rowing in Ha Long Bay, in northern Vietnam. A guide
told me that on occasion, if you were lucky, monkeys could be seen climbing and chatting among the rocks. Now, I love monkeys. I love them a degree further
than is probably sane. I've visited a monkey temple in India, fed a
baby monkey in Thailand, I even have a t-shirt proclaiming my monkey
love. And yet no monkeys appeared on those rocks. Imagine, if you
can, my despair. I longed for those monkeys to voyage down, if only I
could call to them in a voice they could understand, they would
surely not deny me the pleasure of their company...
That's
the long route to saying this: I'm writing a novel about families who
can communicate with animals.
I'm
also still writing poetry and will shortly be editing my upcoming
collection The Green Dress Whose Girl is Sleeping
(due for publication with Freight Books in 2015) with editor Andrew Philip.
Question
2: How does my work differ from others of its genre?
I'm
perhaps most well known for my work in the sub-genre of Science
Fiction Poetry, having published two pamphlets of my own (“The Last Refuge” from Forest Publications in 2009, and “Spaces of Their Own” from Stewed Rhubarb Press in 2013) and edited a book of
contemporary sci-fi poems from the UK (“Where Rockets Burn Through”
from Penned in the Margins, 2013). The science fictional element
seems to have the ability to draw in new audiences, primarily fans of
SF, which I am very happy about because it gets non-poetry-readers a
bit more interested in poetry, as well as breaking apart some of the
snobbishness of poetry and genre.
So far
as the novel goes, it's a young adult book (of which there be many)
but aside from the story line I've been trying to challenge notions of
gender, race and class by inverting them. It's also a book about
politics and power, which are subjects I think we tend to –
incorrectly – shy away from when giving books to young people. It
will include lots of monkeys.
Question
3: Why do I write what I do?
This
is a question my mum would ask me. In terms of poetry, I write to
distill my thoughts and to see what language can do, how it can change
my perception. I think there's something almost scientific about
poetry, it's a process of discovery, of experimentation, of refining
and refracting, and re-examining the results. What comes out isn't
necessarily what went in, the conclusion isn't necessarily the aim.
And that's good because it bends the box and slaps you around the
face a bit.
My
novel feels more like an escape, a world I'd like to visit (although
probably not live in). It's a chance to explore my characters and see
who they become, as arsey and artsy as that sounds. Perhaps they're
imaginary friends; I want to help them out, to lead them down
uncertain paths and see what's on the other side.
In all
honesty there's a financial element to novel writing too. Poetry is a
labour of love, I know I'll never make my fortune from it. More
people are willing to pick up a novel and to pay for it.
Question
4: How does your writing process work?
I have
two rules when writing: don't do it when drunk, and don't do it when
overly emotional. I break them both.
A poem
starts as a line in my head, I hear it first like a piece of music from a broken
record that wants me to place the needle back on the groove. The poem
grows from that line, I don't know what it is when I start it and it's not always clear by the end. Sometimes I am interested in the poem as
an experiment. Hey what would happen if I wrote a bunch of
one word poems, or a sequence of sonnets about sexbots?
Sometimes it feels like more of an expulsion, to sweat something out
and jar it. A nice jar of sweat. I try not to force out or overwork a
poem, rather I just let them come as they will, sometimes a dozen in
a day, other times nothing for months. I almost always work on a
laptop: the appearance of the poem is very important to me and if I
need to scratch things out with pen and paper its messiness would
disturb me and throw me off the scent. Editing can take anywhere from
minutes to months. In 2008 I started a poem that is just 25 words
long, and I'm still not happy with it. That said, once I feel a poem
is finished I don't like to touch it after about 5 years. That feels
like I'm editing my old self, trying to pretend they didn't exist or
that somehow the person I am now is a “better” poet, with more
worthwhile things to say. And that seems very rude to Old-Me.
Writing
a novel feels more planned out. Probably because I use a
somewhat extensive plan. I know where things start, their potential
endings, but not necessarily the finer details in between. The
characters react and change, they think things over and respond. I
can't plan that part of things because I don't know the characters
well enough until they're faced with the dilemma, the romance, the
massive murderous bear with platinum claws that chases after them.
Redrafting prose is currently an enigma to me, although I imagine it
will be copious.
If
you've managed to get this far then well done! All that's left is to
introduce the next writer, Colin McGuire. Colin has published a pamphlet of poems about sleep, "Everybody Lie Down and No One Gets Hurt" with Red Squirrel Press, and is well known around the Scottish spoken word scene. He has reached the finals of the BBC Poetry Slam and runs a regular poetry night in Edinburgh, called Talking Heids. He can be followed on his blog, here! A full length collection of Colin's work is due out this year.
Peace
and monkeys be with you.
Tuesday, 25 March 2014
"The Last Refuge" e-book
Hear ye, hear ye, "The Last Refuge" (my 2009 pamphlet of sci-fi poems from Forest Publications) is now available on e-book.
It includes poems about A.I in supermarket barcode scanners, Android birthday parties, a poem from the perspective of a nuclear warhead and more...
It's only £0.77 and is a nice little taster to get you in the mood for "Spaces of Their Own" if you don't already own it.
Buy it here.
Russell Jones
Sci-fi Poetry Awards news
Yarr, ye scurvy Earth Lovers. Whilst I wes washin me space britches in the seas of Neptune I happened me across a few award nominations. Take yer hypershovel and dig at em, afore they leech into that thar parallel universe. Yarr.
Yeh "Spaces of Their Own" has been nominated for a few things, check em out:
* "Spaces of Their Own" nominated for the Elgin Award.
Find the other nominees here
* "After the Moons" nominated for the Rhysling Award.
Check out the other potentials here
* "After the Moons", "Re-entry" and "The Ant Swap" long listed for the 9th annual Data Dump Award.
Russell Jones
Wednesday, 12 March 2014
Listen to science fiction poems from Where Rockets Burn Through
The one-woman sci-fi poetry guru, Diane Severson Mori, has published an outstanding review of "Where Rockets Burn Through" and "Spaces of Their Own", on the Amazing Stories website.
It includes a big fat slice of sci-fi poetry recordings from a host of great contemporary poets, which I urge you to listen to RIGHT NOW.
Listen to poems by:
Jane Irina McKie
James McGonigal
Sarah Hesketh
Andy Jackson
Simon Barraclough
Jane Yolen
Dilys Rose
Aiko Harman
Ian McLachlan
Kirsten Irving
Kona MacPhee
Bill Herbert
Andrew James Wilson
Claire Askew
Sue Guiney
Ron Butlin
Pippa Goldschmidt
Russell Jones
A poetry book review: Locust and Marlin by JL Williams
Locust and Marlin
JL Williams
Shearsman Books
Our position in the
world, and how we reflect on it, is one of the key concerns of this
book. This seemed apt to me as I sat in the sunny March of Holyrood
Park in Edinburgh, my dog panting at my side, Locust and Marlin
getting grubbied by my mud slathered hands. It was a fine setting for
reading this book (surrounded by volcanic hills, the hum of the city
in the background, people walking to work) in which nature, god and
our place in the universe are pondered. There is something quite
transformative about reading a collection of poems in a relevant
space, and the near-miracle of a Scottish sun made it all the
sweeter.
If Williams reads
this review then she may laugh at what I'm about to say, because when
I bought the book at the Scottish Poetry Library I obsessed over
this: the cover feels great. It's a peculiar thing to mention in a
book review but the front and back of Locust and Marlin has a
velvety finish that makes it pleasurable to hold. The cover image –
a sea blue menagerie with hidden images of insects, birds and fish –
also rings of the natural imagery and mythology to be found within
the poems. Shearsman have done a fine job in creating an artefact
worth holding, for sure.
But what of the
poems themselves? There's a refreshing brevity to Williams' work,
splashes of life and colour that aren't afraid to let themselves stop
ahead of schedule. These are glimpses, ruminations, reflections. They
avoid answers, and I admire that in a poem. A quiet confidence
permeates the collection, in which the poet taps us on the shoulder
to ask what we're doing. There are longer pieces too, some of
which were amongst my favourites as they begin to dig up the earth a
little more.
You could dip in
and out of this book and take something from each of the verses. The
opening poem, for example, “Heron”, is a short meditation on the
nature of the imagination, and a fine beginning to a collection that
requires us to fill in the gaps it leaves behind. I would like to
show the poem in full, but it's not the done thing, so here are the
first four lines (of seven):
Imagine a great
silence
whose wings touch
no branches.
Imagine a space
demarcated
by lack of sound.
Cleverly, this
heron is returned to in the final poem, “Revelation”, which is
only three lines long, ending: “the feeling of the fishes brushing
his legs”. The revelation is the acceptance of being, of nescience,
of its position in the world; a revelation which perhaps we share by
the end of the book. There's that biblical reference too, of course,
and this is a frequently visited home in the collection. The
narrators don't always quite know what to do with god, or the notion
of it. In “Like Phaeton (3)” for example, the “He” of the
poem remains ambiguous, its repetition almost mimicking laughter:
He.
He. He.
…
He does not speak
as others do.
Comparatively, in
“Son (3)” Williams writes:
God isn't here to
stake out dry tongues,
to lay claim to
scorched fields of hay.
This difference is
by no means a criticism of the approaches taken to such a demanding
topic, in fact a reduction of god, or an understanding of it, to
absolutes, would be to undermine the complexity of it. As a reader
with an innate aversion to religiousness in poetry, I was paranoid
that this frequent reference would irk or bore me, but that was
thankfully avoided. Williams considers the personal, theological and
psychological aspects of her core concepts to keep them refreshing.
Although they don't all hit the same notes, I was particularly
enamoured by the peculiar, sometimes even grotesque language in poems
like “Son”, in lines such as “The wind is a cow” and “I can
imagine how my lungs smell”. The anatomist in me likes that.
But this isn't to
say that the collection is without flaws. As the cover images imply,
there are a lot of seas, birds, fish and stones in this book. I'd say
the majority of the poems mention them at some point, and whilst
book-long tropes can be impressive, they did blur into one another at
times and I found myself thinking “oh bloody hell not another
stone”. This could have jarred the pleasurable experience of
reading the book as a whole, even though it did at times make chimes
and tinkles between the poems. And whilst the book asks questions, it
asks too many of them, and too overtly. It's full of rhetoric-isms,
and although this does lend itself to the nature of questioning our
spiritual and actual place in the world, the combined effect is to
dampen the concern of each (however well meant or interesting they
might be). The most successful poems present these ideas without
firing them – shotgun like – at us. These large concepts need to
be drawn out of the poem through the reader's interpretation, and in
poems such as “Blinding” (perhaps my favourite of them all) this
is achieved succinctly and powerfully. The closing lines read:
.........................................................women knead the
bread
water unveils
its secret
......................................................... hungry mouths
are fed
one to shine
one to see the
shining
The pleasure of
Locust and Marlin is most profoundly felt on reading it as a
whole. Its tone is inviting, gentle, reassuring in its subliminal
declaration that there are no real answers, and that we must each
find our place amongst the questions. As good poetry ought to, this
book made me leave that sunny park a little different to when I
arrived, and though I washed the mud from my hands when I got home
I've still got some of it under my nails.
Tuesday, 28 January 2014
Buying a Poster
A number of people have approached me about buying a copy of "1 in 5 teenagers with experiment with poetry" for their doors, fridges, trash cans and so on.
Unfortunately I do not own the images I used on the poster, as I only created it as a silly little thing to show my friends. It's now been shared many thousands of times.
In conclusion: sorry, I cannae print and sell you a poster. But feel free to take a good old gander at it on my blog, and to do as you see fit----
Peace
Russell Jones
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





